Wednesday, November 27, 2019

Neanderthal-Homo Sapiens Hybri essays

Neanderthal-Homo Sapiens Hybri essays Implications of Neanderthal-Homo Sapiens Hybrid from the Abrigo do Lagar Velho (Portugal) In a recent excavation at Abrigo do Lagar Velho in Portugal, Duarte et al (1999) unearthed what was later to be recognized as early human skeletal remains which pointed to interbreeding between Neanderthal and Modern Humans during the mid - upper Palaeolithic transition. The morphology of the remains, belonging to a child of approximately 3-4 years old, indicates a Neanderthal typology in post-cranial features, and more modern cranial features. The find has been cited as evidence of hybridization between the two traditionally separate human lines, and offers an explanation to the question of Neanderthal extinction. (Trinkaus 1999) Anthropologists are now offered a line of evidence pointing to the contemopranity of Moderns and Neanderthals in parts of Europe and assumptions can be made about their contact: "The discoverers...are making a ground-breaking claim, that the skeleton shows traces of bo th Neanderthal and modern human ancestry, evidence that modern humans did not simply extinguish the Neanderthals, as many researchers had come to think. Instead the two kinds of human were so alike that in Portugal, at least, they intermingled...for thousands of years." (Kunzig, 1999) By examining the theories of human evolution, and looking at the cultural evolution of tool technology as well as the biological transitions and differences between the two types of humans, we can see that this hybridization just might be the answer. Perhaps this find will be able to tell us what exactly did happen to the Neanderthals. Firstly, it is useful to have an overview of the different theories of human evolution, or I should say the two most widely accepted views as accepted by palaeo-anthropologists in the field. For some years now it has been the contention that the origins of modern humans stem from either a continuous evolution from archaic to modern humans in loc...

Saturday, November 23, 2019

Same Sex Marriages and Society essays

Same Sex Marriages and Society essays Is it appropriate for homosexuals to share the rest of their lives together? Marriage is intended for a male and female. Same sex marriage is not constitutional. There are many morals and values, when marriage is approached between two individuals. There are some traditions you do not change. Homosexual marriage is one of them. I do not agree with homosexuals marrying each other. Homosexuals in relationships get talked about in a bad way already. Society does not say too much about the situation. Marriage is beyond the other matter, so society has a major problem with that. Society feels their lifestyle would not be complete. Homosexuals will not receive the respect heterosexuals couples get. Homosexuals will find themselves making their life harder than what it already is. Homosexuals are not worried about their future. What about when it comes time to have children? What about living their life peacefully? Letting a homosexual couple get married is one big step. It would be impossible to have children. They would have to try to adopt children to make a traditional family. Homosexuals are denied the right to marry. Yes, it is a violation of religious freedom. (Jacoby 3). I feel someone does need to speak up on the situation. According to the first Amendment a persons religious views must be protected. Homosexuals trying to get married shows no type of religious belief. Besides they are already breaking the rules by trying to attempt to marry. Why do they have to show America they want to get married? They can live their lifestyles together peacefully. But, taking a homosexual relationship to the next level is crazy. There are numerous of different ways they can act. Their behavior is not accepted. Seeing two people of the same sex kissing is distasteful. How do you explain to a child who sees this? They might think its okay. What will happen if children decided to kiss the same gender in school? They would probably ...

Thursday, November 21, 2019

Review of 'State Crime' Literature Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Of 'State Crime' - Literature review Example hat dealing with state crime is inevitable, since there is no state that enjoys immunity from the breaching of human rights and liberties as a way of attaining its goals. Green and Ward (2005, 161) contend that state crime is instrumentally propounded by prevailing structural conditions. To this effect, corruption is factored into this debate as being furthered by two explanatory concepts of patrimonialism and clientelism. Clientelism is seen as referring to an exchange system whereby public officials and patrons accord political favours to their constituents or clients. As such, state-corporate crime, police crime and state-organised crime are the kind of aberrations that may follow clientelism. Green and Ward (2005, 161) also advance the notion that in countries where the government practices clientelism, state violence may surface, but those who are governed readily consent to the system, and thereby making this form of deviance less objectionable. Green and Ward (2005, 161) argue that patrimonialism readily invites the violent forms of state corruption because there are societies that profit through corruption and have thus made corruption their goals. In the instance when the interests of the ruler and the nation become inflated the door is left ajar for all manner and levels of corruption, with war crimes, state terror, torture and genocide being included. Green and Ward (2005, 162) maintain that a state’s predisposition to the use of patrimonialism, corruption or clientelism is underpinned by political and economic factors. Particularly, democratically mature capitalist states may have a predisposition to clientelism, but the heavy presence of civic organisations inhibits the patrimonialism from becoming full-fledged. In another wavelength, these two scholars postulate that proto-states and colonies or former colonies are the worst of predatory states, as far the breaching of human rights and civil liberties is concerned. According to Green and Ward,